≡ Menu

Two Thumbs Up!

The news du jour from China is that Google might pull out of that country.

But here’s another, much-less-trumpeted piece of news that is cause for optimism about the future of freedom in China: In a report on how the movie ‘Avatar’ is perceived by the Chinese people, yesterday’s Wall Street Journal reports that “China’s moviegoers see a story about private property, not race.”

Hollywood blockbusters aren’t usually notable for their artistic or political subtlety. And James Cameron’s latest sci-fi hit, “Avatar,” would seem to be no exception, going by the lament of some critics that the film’s impressive special effects are undercut by a skimpy story line and flat dialogue.

That, however, is not how many Chinese see the film, which tells the story of rapacious humans trying to evict the blue-skinned natives of the planet Pandora in order to extract some exceedingly valuable mineral. This is standard politically correct fare for a Western audience, conveying a message of racial sensitivity and environmental awareness. In China, however, it has more rebellious undertones.

That’s because Chinese local governments in cahoots with developers have become infamous for forcibly seeking to evict residents from their homes with little compensation and often without their consent. The holdouts are known as “nail households,” since their homes are sometimes left stranded in the middle of busy construction sites. More often, however, they are driven away by paid thugs. Private property is one of the most sensitive issues in the country today, and “Avatar” has given the resisters a shot in the arm.

Even in Hong Kong, the “Avatar” banner has been taken up by antigovernment activists trying to defeat a plan to demolish a village to make way for a new high-speed railway line. One mysterious benefactor reportedly donated movie tickets to the villagers to stoke their enthusiasm for protests.

We suspect that neither Mr. Cameron nor 20th Century Fox (a sister company to this newspaper) had any idea of the effect their movie would have on the other side of the world. But then such flukes are one of the wonderful things about globalization, confounding those who lament its supposedly homogenizing effects on culture.

(HT Karol Boudreaux)