It’s child’s play to conjure up hypothetical scenarios in which this economic move today by Jones, or that economic effort today by Williams, threatens future harm to Smith that Smith’s overlord – acting ideally and with an ideal amount of knowledge – can save Smith from suffering tomorrow by obstructing Smith’s freedom of action today. The questions are, however, these: How realistic are such hypotheticals? And how realistic is it to assume that Smith’s overlord will act both with better knowledge than is possessed by Smith and with Smith’s best interest foremost in mind?
Next post: Quotation of the Day…
Previous post: To Repeat: Imports are Benefits and Exports are Costs