Higgs on the Bailout

by Don Boudreaux on October 7, 2008

in Current Affairs, Financial Markets, Government intervention in housing, Politics

Here’s Bob Higgs on the bailout ‘plan.’  I especially like this paragraph:

Sure enough, in the days after the bill’s initial defeat, its managers
took the monstrosity that had failed on Monday and made it even uglier.
Their purpose, of course, was to buy off the bill’s opponents in
Congress by sweetening it with all sorts of more or less unrelated
provisions intended to channel benefits to the opponents’ constituents
and supporters. In short, in Washington last week, business went on as
usual: Congress is the name; corruption is the game.

Yes.  Thank goodness we Americans have mature, responsible, wise, and courageous ‘leaders’ in government to regulate markets.

Children can be excused for believing in Santa Claus; they are, after all, children.  Adults cannot be excused for believing in the beneficence and wisdom of the state.  This institution’s foolishness and predations are visible for all who care to see.  I can respect at least the intelligence of those who defend the state as their means of extracting wealth from others — that is, for example, I can respect the intelligence of U.S. auto executives who defend the state as their means of extracting the $25 billion recently ponied up by Uncle Sam to help G.M., Ford, and Chrysler.  I can respect their intelligence even as I loathe their ethics.

But I cannot respect the intelligence of adults who continue to insist that empowering strangers sitting beneath a marble dome to take and spend other people’s money is wise and sensible.  And my respect for such alleged ‘intelligence’ dissolves even further when I reflect upon the fact that those persons who insist on trusting the state (because its top officials are elected democratically) see — or should see — the disgraceful behavior that these officials each engage in to win their gaudy glory.

Comments    Share Share    Print Print    Email Email

  • muirgeo

    The supposed out for the libertarians with their ideological backs to the wall is to blame the coming world recession on government and the fact that we don't truly have a free market.


    Whatever intelligence I do have its an insult to it when people bring up Freddie and Fannie and the CRA as the cause of this collapse. The facts and the logic just don't support the hopes that the claim will sound good. Even the people writing these things, I think, know they are not true but must be written to protect a fractured ideology. It is in my opinion a case of cognitive dissonance.


    The current world crisis was a result of the financial weapons of mass destruction as predicted by an expert long ago. This also well documented on the most recent 60 Minutes piece.


    ""The instruments themselves are at the heart of this mess," Grant says. "They are complex, in effect, mortgage science projects devised by these Nobel-tracked physicists who came to work on Wall Street for the very purpose of creating complex instruments with all manner of detailed protocols, and who gets paid when and how much. And the complexity of the structures is at the very center of the crisis of credit today."

    says Jim Grant, the editor of "Grant's Interest Rate Observer.




    I still support government by the people because as of yet it is the best thing history has seen for the advancement of the human condition. Like the free marketers who claim the free market didn't fail because it wasn't quite truly totally free I will make the same sort of claim to hold onto my ideology.


    Government by the people has not failed as we don't have that... we have a government run by corporations... by plutocrats. This is the result of classic liberal forces powering our government and the publics image of it. Here should be placed a picture of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Reagan being quoted as saying the government is not the solution its the problem. That ideology has ruled the day since that hand shake and ultimately led to rule by plutocrats just as I would predict any libertarian based society to result in.


    Now maybe I suffer from delusions as well but I think there is a real solution ... a fix... that can return us to a government by the people. But at least I have a hope for a solution.




    When I read the post above I see some one complaining about the system as it is who also seems to know of a better system. Apparently a much better system but can not even attempt to put into words with out massive self contradiction how we human social beings are to get to this better system. And I also believe I see some one who has not thought of the likely real world human psychosocial reasons why such a system is doomed to failure and why no such system can be found existing in the real world.


    I don't have all the answers but I do believe my intelligence demands respect too because I sure as heck don't see the obvious answers being written about here. And I'm not convinced it's my ideas that have brought the global society to the precipice of total collapse... no one seems to know what the next few days much less the next few years could look like. A bump on the road or a massive die off of people I really can't exclude either but the best way to get the worst result is to have closed minds.


    Professors thanks again for this good blog.

  • Methinks

    Right on cue, the village idiot appears. You lack intelligence, Muirdiot, thus there is nothing to respect. However, as you lack basic intelligence, you probably don't understand this.

  • muirgeo

    methinks


    To see a world in a grain of sand

    And a heaven in a wildflower,


    Hold infinity in the palm of your hand


    And eternity in an hour.

  • Oil Shock

    Muirgeo,


    Jim Grant is a freemarket Austrian leaning analyst. Very interesting that you would quote him to support your otherwise silly statements.


    The reason why all these derivatives were possible, is not because of a lack of supervision of the child, who was playing with a loaded gun, but the loaded gun itself. Loaded gun was provided by Government regulation - taxation, inflation and interest rate manipulation. Banking is one of the most regulated businesses and all regulations are created to favor the bankers themselves, as can be expected from an all powerful government on the payroll of the plutocrats. It is a cartel and like all cartels, it exists only with government help and regulation. The whole deposit banking is a giant pyramid scheme. Read Murray Rothbard's Case against the Fed.

  • Will

    "Government by the people has not failed as we don't have that... we have a government run by corporations... by plutocrats."


    Which is the inevitable result of any system of government. The incentives in such a system are simply broken. The government merely allows corporations to use force-by-proxy upon the consumers. The worst thing we could do to corporations would be to give them a free market, which would leave them no choice but to serve the consumers.


    "This is the result of classic liberal forces powering our government and the publics image of it. Here should be placed a picture of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Reagan being quoted as saying the government is not the solution its the problem. That ideology has ruled the day since that hand shake and ultimately led to rule by plutocrats just as I would predict any libertarian based society to result in."


    Government pork was invented by Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan? I sincerely hope you don't actually believe that.


    Besides, the free market ideology most certainly has not been in power for a long time, if it ever was. Even though the Republicans pay lip service to free market ideals, just about everything they do (particularly under Bush) contradicts them. I don't know how you think "classical liberal forces" run the government.

  • Rick

    Guys,

    I come on here just to read and laugh at Muirgeo's postings, but I absolutely savor the way you all tear him apart. Thanks.

  • John V

    Muirgeo,


    it seems Will beat me to the punch:


    You say:


    Government by the people has not failed as we don't have that... we have a government run by corporations... by plutocrats."


    SAME THING. This is where all your grand ideas about what society should look like and how we can romantically achieve it fall part. A government by the people IS a government run by plutocrats elected by "the people". Ever wonder nearly all politicians are upper class? Plebs like you and me elect them to do wonderful things that never turn out the way you intend. Then they ask for more power. And the Plebs keep giving it too them with grand promises that never come to fruition. The self-reinforcing cycle keeps intensifying and then, before you know it, government power becomes very high stakes because IT CONTROLS EVERYTHING.


    You want a government where Jack Smith on Main St. in Oklahoma and Tyrone Jackson working in the Bronx have the same power as well organized and connected plutocrats? A silly dream. An impossible dream. A dream that drives plebs into self-enslavement.


    And then who the Plebs blame? They blame their few fellow plebs like me and others here who were wise to this charade from the start and never wanted to have anything to with it.


    Plebs like me and others here would rather others join us and tell the government to stop doing us so many favors, to decentralize and shrink its scope.


    Who would lose by doing this? Not the plebs but rather the wealthy and connected who use it as a tool for legal rent-seeking.


    You simply don't get this.

  • He doesn't want to get it. He's made so much investment in his model, he derives his identity from it. George is now the product of his hatreds and fears as he clings tightly to the oligarchical structure with the promise of people controlled government.


    I can VOTE! I am all powerful! Yay!

  • Methinks

    To see a world in a grain of sand

    And a heaven in a wildflower,


    Hold infinity in the palm of your hand


    And eternity in an hour.


    Pass the bong.

  • And eternity in an hour.


    That would be listening to muirgeo for an hour.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: