What we have here is a failure to communicate

by Russ Roberts on January 21, 2010

in Hubris and humility

Yes, it was just a messaging problem. From the Washington Post:

President Obama on Wednesday blamed the Democrats’ stunning loss of their filibuster-proof majority in the Senate on his administration’s failure to give voice to the economic frustrations of the middle class, a disconnect that White House aides vowed to quickly address as they continue to work to advance the president’s agenda.

Obama said the relentless pursuit of his domestic policies — and a failure to adequately explain their virtues — had left Americans with a “feeling of remoteness and detachment” from the flurry of government actions in Washington.

That’s right. It has nothing to do with the bloated budget, the payoffs to political friends like the unions in bailing out Detroit and exempting them from health care taxes, the rising debt, the coddling of Wall Street, the stimulus package that didn’t stimulate, the grandiosity of redesigning the health care system and the energy sector. No, it was a feeling of remoteness and detachment. Angst. A failure to connect.

“We were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us that I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are and why we have to make sure those institutions are matching up with those values,” he told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

Getting stuff done? Like closing Gitmo? You bragged about that promise incessantly then failed to keep it. Like listening to the father of a terrorist worried his son is going to strike? That didn’t get done.

And then there’s the stuff that did get done–shoveling money to the states to shore up public employment while private employment continues to fall. Expanding the debt ceiling. Letting the House and the Senate design the stimulus package and health care. What did you get done? Cash for Clunkers? Near nationalization of the auto industry and the financial sector? You did win the Nobel Prize. Congratulations.

And yes, you did lose a “sense of speaking directly to the American people” about our core values. When was your last press conference, Mr. President?

The admission came as the president’s top aides sought to come to terms with political disaster in the aftermath of the GOP’s Senate victory in Massachusetts.

Unfortunately, it’s the wrong admission. And yes, I know it’s all spin. But the answer is a lot simpler. The dogs don’t like the food you’re dishing out.

Comments    Share Share    Print Print    Email Email

  • Well, knowing politics in general, and being a Republican in MA, it won't surprise if me he tacks Left of center over the course of his senatorial career, but it's still a very meaningful victory. A Republican took the seat that a Kennedy held for decades. Period.

    No coincidence that Zuckerman, et al are dumping on Obama wholesale immediately afterwards.

    As for his accomplishments, where are all of those that were screaming foul over the Patriot Act type of stuff? Is it okay as long as Obama is CIC?
  • HaywoodU
    Oh if only Obama and his administration spent more time explaining and less time pursuing his domestic policies.
  • vidyohs
    When I heard the audio clip this morning of Obama giving his explantion I immediately thought to myself:

    And this is coming from the most exposed and constantly in your face with talking and messages of any president in my long memory?

    You couldn't even watch a football game without his supremeness sticking his face and message into your downtime.

    If anything Obama spent more time talking and being promoted than most us can comprehend, but his problem was he didn't have anything of substance to say.
  • So you're likening the voters to dogs? How very cynical of you!
  • The logic is this:

    We (Obamalini Admin) failed in our commitment to the (flagrantly leftist) agenda we committed to last November, when there was palpable voter dissatisfaction with the previous 8 years. Because we failed to deliver on our (socialist) promises, which promised to reverse most of the prior Republican agenda, they elected another Republican. One who presents the roadblock to our entire legislative agenda.

    That is the level of stupidity and illogic here, kids.
  • Robert
    "I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are and why we have to make sure those institutions are matching up with those values"

    The consistent message here is speaking directly TO the American people rather than speaking WITH them about their core values.

    Details matter and expose a lot of the underlying truth of someone's real intentions.
  • Miko
    "Like listening to the father of a terrorist worried his son is going to strike?" sounds great in hindsight, but when it comes up it sounds more like hearsay. What do you propose--a national hotline where people can call in, say the magic T-word and have their neighbors preemptively stripped of their civil liberties just in case?
  • Russ - You called it with your dog food story. Props.
  • Dave P
    What's funny is that some of the stuff you mentioned like redesigning the energy sector, favoring unions, favoring the public sector, etc. is all stuff that tends to resonate in MA. Some of it is stuff Scott Brown even supports, however to say that Brown won that seat in a state that was used as the model for the federal bill does say a lot.
  • JohnDewey
    Forgive me for sounding skeptical, but what are the Obama/Democratic initiatives that "Scott Brown even supports"?
  • Dave P
    He has voted for "green jobs" and tax increases before and while he may not support the national health care plan he certainly supports the MA plan.
  • JohnDewey
    I'll do some more research, but I'm pretty sure Scott Brown is a fiscal conservative. In any case, here's what Reuter's reports:

    "Brown's voting record has won high grades from business and gun owner groups and Citizens for Limited Taxation, and low marks from the National Organization for Women, the Massachusetts Teachers Association and the AFL-CIO."
  • Dave P
    It's more likely that he's a fiscal conservative for MA (or compared to Ted Kennedy) than for the rest of the country. I bet after the dust settles some of the same people who have praised him as a conservative will be cursing his name as a "RINO" and grouping him with people like Olympia Snowe and Lincoln Chafee.
    I grew up there and regularly go back to visit and I just have a hard time believing they would ever elect a true conservative.
  • CRC
    It seems to me that the modern liberal mind has an inability to comprehend the possibility that they could be wrong in their policies, plans and proposals. They are so convinced that their good intentions (and, yes, often their intentions are good) automatically ordain their plans as "good" or "right" and that anyone opposed must simply be confused, ignorant, stupid or just plain evil and obstinate.

    This mindset, of course, lacks any true humility or doubt or contrition about their own positions forcing them to look outward to what must be wrong with others. This "admission" is not self-deprecating at all. In fact it is the ultimate in smugness and arrogance that comes from this neo-liberal/progressive mentality in which those who oppose them just don't get it.
  • Great post!

    I wonder though... Given his "accomplishments" as president, does this mean that our "core values" include waging undeclared wars with THOUSANDS of civilian casualties ("collatoral damage") and robbery (i.e., debt, inflation, taxes).

    hmmm.... I'd appreciate it if he kept his core values to himself.
  • James
    Hasn't government spending been a key growth component of GDP over the past two quarters?
  • David Shaw
    I love this:

    "I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are."

    Oh yes great overlord, please do tell me what my core values are. I'd be a babe lost in the woods without your gentle and wise guidance.
  • magilson
    I read that exactly the same way.
  • russroberts
    Good one. I missed the causation implied in the syntax.
  • martinbrock
    One state elects the most Democrat-lite Republican imaginable, and suddenly, everything changes? Didn't we just elect Mr. Hope and Change a year ago? And nothing much changed, right? He turned out to be the most Republican-lite Democrat imaginable, when it comes to Republican favorites in the state sector. Didn't he? What am I missing here?

    It's all a freakin' dog and pony show. We'll get meaningful change when things are a whole lot worse than they are now, when Americans are actually starving in droves, and I don't really expect that to happen. Nothing can stop the burgeoning, Orwellian state in the meantime. We haven't even seen 70s-level stagflation yet.
  • JohnDewey
    martinbrock: "One state elects the most Democrat-lite Republican imaginable"

    It's not "one state". It's the most liberal state.

    I do not believe Scott Brown is "the most Democrat-lite Republican imaginable". Here's a few known Scott Brown positions:

    Opposes same-sex marriage
    Opposes national cap and trade program
    Favors strengthening our border
    Favors employment verification program to catch illegal workers
    Favors capital punishment for heinous crimes
    Opposes partial birth abortion
    Favors parental notification and consent requirements for minor teenage abortions
    Opposes Obamacare
    Opposes card check legislation

    Those positions don't even sound middle of the road to me.
  • martinbrock
    Dozens of Democratic Congressmen and Senators take the same positions on these issues, with the possible exception of Obamacare.

    The abortion positions are positively left of center. No pro-life organization accepts someone making only these exceptions as one of their own. More than half of Democrats probably take similar positions on abortion.

    Obama himself opposes same-sex marriage. He only favors civil unions, as Brown does.

    Obama himself favors capital punishment for heinous crimes.

    Every politician wants to "strengthen the border", and sanctions for employing illegal immigrants are hardly right wing. I oppose sanctions for employing illegal immigrants myself.

    Opposing card check is "conservative", but it's also incredibly statist. How labor unions poll their members is no business of the Congress.

    These are mostly show issues anyway. Only the opposition to Obamacare and cap and trade impress me, and ten Democratic Senators bucked Obama on cap and trade last year. The trouble with Brown is all the corporatist BS that he does support.
  • brotio
    How labor unions poll their members is no business of the Congress.

    I would agree with that, if management was also free to say, "I will not negotiate with a union, and if you strike, I will assume you quit, and replace you." The government already meddles in this, and has said that people who strike over safety concerns cannot be fired. So when the Steelworkers struck, it was over "safety issues", and because Clinton is a Democrat, the NLRB agreed.
  • JohnK
    Great, now I've got Guns n Roses stuck in my head.
  • Dave P
    "it feeds the rich but it buries the poor" still works
  • russroberts
    I actually intended an older reference from 1967.
  • David Shaw
    Haha professor, of course its from "Cool Hand Luke." I'm just guessing JohnK has heard "Civil War" about a million times and seen the movie only 3 or 4 (like me).
  • JohnK
    Your guess is correct.
  • russroberts
    "Ain't nobody ever et fifty eggs." Or at least that's the way I remember
    the line.
  • David Shaw
    You say that like its a bad thing.
  • brotio
    Listening to Axl Rose do his Edith Bunker imitations is a bad thing.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: